
|
Vol. 26
|
INTRODUCTION: WHAT DOES OAKLEY TELL US ABOUT THE FAILURES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING?
Taylor Flynn 1
STATE v. OAKLEY, DEADBEAT DADS, AND AMERICAN POVERTY
David Ray Papke 9
LIBERATION AND EMPOWERMENT: A JUBILEAN ALTERNATIVE FOR STATE v. OAKLEY
Richard P. Cole 27
COERCIVE ABORTIONS AND CRIMINALIZING THE BIRTH OF CHILDREN: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE IMPACT ON WOMEN OF STATE V. OAKLEY
Jennifer Martin 67
PROBATION RESTRICTIONS IMPACTING THE RIGHT TO PROCREATE: THE OAKLEY ERROR
Jennifer Levi 81
A STURDY ROGUE
Bruce K. Miller 109
REAL PROPERTY—GUILIETTI V. GIULIETTI- PARTITION BY PRIVATE SALE ABSENT SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORITY
Gillian K. Bearns 125
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—THE "CHOOSE-LIFE" SPECIALTY PLATE CASES: STANDING TO SUE WHEN THE GOVERNMENT MANIPULATES PUBLIC DEBATE
Layla G. Taylor 169
Cite as 26 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. _____ (2004).
THE GIRL-WIFE AND THE ALIENISTS: THE FORGOTTEN MURDER TRIAL OF JOSEPHINE TERRANOVA
Jacob M. Appel 203
WHEN TRIAL AND PUNISHMENT INTERSECT: NEW DEFECTS IN THE DEATH PENALTY
Alexander Bunin 233
ACCEPTING EVOLUTION IN WORKPLACE JUSTICE: THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO MANDATE ARBITRATION
Frederick L. Sullivan 281
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—THE "GRAPE" MARCH ON WASHINGTON: THE TWENTY-FIRST AMENDMENT, THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE, AND DIRECT ALCOHOL SHIPMENTS
Pamela R. Cote 343
CIVIL RIGHTS—SHADES OF RACE: AN HISTORICALLY INFORMED READING OF TITLE VII
Michael J. Fellows 387
Homepage | Directions | Contact | Site Information | Employment Opportunities | Non-Discrimination Policy
©2009 Western New England University All Rights Reserved
This is an Official Page/Publication of Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts