
|
Vol. 6 1983-1984
|
Cite as 6 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. ____ (1983).
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATIONS OF STATUTES
Claude T. Coffman 1
DEFERENCE TO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES IN FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY LITIGATION—THOUGHTS ON VARYING JUDICIAL APPLICATION OF THE RULE
Donald W. Stever, Jr. 35
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS: DUAL REPRENSENTATION—LAWYERS STRETCHING THE RULES
Gail S. Shaulys 73
CRIMINAL LAW—JUDICIAL RESENTENCING OF OFFENDERS AFTER SERVICE HAS COMMENCED—State v. Hunter, 447 A.2d 797 (Maine 1982)
Darlene E. Gerry 147
TORT AND PROPERTY LAW—THE MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT SOUNDS THE DEATH KNELL FOR SECTION 14—Simon v. Solomon, 385 Mass 91, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
Melinda Wilkins Hunkins 169
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT—BYPASSING THE HEART OF Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247 (1981)—OBTAINING PUNITIVE DAMAGES FROM MUNICIPALITIES FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
Marcia E. Prussel 193
COPYRIGHT LAW—VIDEOTAPING LIVE TELEVISION NEWS BROADCASTS FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES—WXIA-TV v. Duncan, 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2075 (N.D.Ga. June 28, 1982)
Joan C. Steiger 225
Holmes v. Preferred Properties, Inc., 190 Conn. 808, 462 A.2d 1057 (1983)
Michael Auger 245
Commonwealth v. Kater, 388 Mass. 519, 447 N.E.2d 1190 (1983)
Patricia J. Nowak 253
Commonwealth v. Schulze, 389 Mass. 735, 452 N.E.2d 216 (1983)
Robin L. Oaks 259
Cite as 6 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. ____ (1983).
UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF INDIGENTS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM—THE INDIANA EXPERIENCE
Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Jeffrey S. Bork, and Seymour H. Moskowitz 263
PROBABLE CAUSE REVISTED: SOME DISTURBING IMPLICATIONS EMANATING FROM Illinois v. Gates
Edward G. Mascolo 331
FAMILY LAW—In re Department of Public Welfare, 1981 Mass. Adv. Sh. 1157, 421 N.E. 2d 28
Nancy B. Alisberg 447
TORT LAW—THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM'S WRONGFUL CONCEPTION OF "WRONGFUL LIFE"—Turpin v. Sortini, 31 Cal.3d 220, 643 P.2d 954, 182 Cal. Rptr. 337 (1982)
Dawn E. Currier 493
CIVIL LAW—SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS—PARENT AND CHILD LIABILITY: IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT VIOLATED?—Spence v. Gormley, 387 Mass. 258, 439 N.E.2d 741 (1982)
Ina A. Forman 511
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—THE "ABORTED" EVOLUTION OF FETAL RIGHTS AFTER Roe v. Wade—Douglas v. Town of Hartford, 542 F. Supp. 1267 (D. Conn. 1982)
Nancy Jo Linck 535
ELECTION LAW—DRAFT COMMITTEES: A LOOPHOLE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS—Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee, 681 F.2d 1281 (11th Cir. 1982)
Kenneth R. Plumb 555
Cite as 6 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. ____ (1984).
FOREWORD: "THIS YEAR'S REFORM IS NEXT YEAR'S NEED FOR REFORM"
Nahum Litt 587
CONTEXTS AND CONTENTS OF "FOR GOOD CAUSE" AS CRITERION FOR REMOVAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES: LEGAL AND POLICY FACTORS
Victor G. Rosenblum 593
THE CENTRAL PANEL SYSTEM AND THE DECISIONMAKING INDEPENDENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES: LESSONS FOR A PROPOSED FEDERAL PROGRAM
Malcom C. Rich 643
THE 1981 MODEL STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT: THE IMPACT ON CENTRAL PANEL STATES
Duane R. Harves 661
ESTABLISHING FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES AS AN INDEPENDENT CORPS: THE HEFLIN BILL
Victor W. Palmer and Edwin S. Bernstein 673
A UNIFIED CORPS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES—THE TRANSITION FROM A CONCEPT TO AN EVENTUAL REALITY
Michel Levant 705
A UNIFIED CORPS OF FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IS NOT NEEDED
Norman Zankel 723
AN EXAMINATION OF THE PROPOSED "CLOSED RECORD" ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE HEARING IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY PROGRAM
Frank R. Lindh 745
THE ROLE OF THE ARTICLE I "TRIAL JUDGE"
Edward F. Lussier 775
HOW NECESSARY IS THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE?
Gerald Harwood 793
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
James P. Timony 807
MASHAW, BUREAUCRATIC JUSTICE: MANAGING SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMS
Richard I. Greenberg 829
ETHICS—A PROPOSAL FOR JUDICIAL CONDEMNATION OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT LIFE STORY FEE AGREEMENTS—Maxwell v. Superior Court, 30 Cal.3d 606, 180 Cal. Rptr. 177, 639 P.2d 248 (1982)
Laura L. Higgins 851
TORT LAW—TELEVIOLENCE: SHOULD BROADCASTERS BE LIABLE? DeFilippo v. National Broadcasting Co., __R.I. __, 446 A.2d 1036 (1982)
Laura Fredricks 897
Cite as 6 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. ____ (1984).
REGULATING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS: A COMMENTARY ON MASSACHUSETTS RULE 25
John M. Thompson 917
TORT LAW—EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND WRONGFUL LIFE CLAIMS IN DES LITIGATION: INJURY WITHOUT REMEDY—Payton v. Abbott Laboratories, 386 Mass. 540, 437 N.E.2d 171 (1982)
Nancy E. Laffey 1037
TORT LAW—MUNICIPAL LIABILITY FOR POLICE HANDLING OF INTOXICATED DRIVERS—Shore v. Town of Stonington, 187 Conn. 147, 444 A.2d 1380 (1982)
Ronald Piombino 1059
CRIMINAL LAW—THE UNCERTAIN STATUS OF THE FELONY-MURDER RULE IN MASSACHUSETTS AFTER Commonwealth v. Matchett, 386 Mass. 492, 436 N.E.2d 400 (1982)
Michael G. Rikard 1081
EVIDENCE—THE SOCIAL WORKER-CLIENT PRIVILEGE—Commonwealth v. Collett, 387 Mass. 424, 439 N.E.2d 1223 (1982)
Susan Starobin 1103
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: PERPETUATING THE TENSION? Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. 707 (1981)
Mark D. Vasington 1131
Homepage | Directions | Contact | Site Information | Employment Opportunities | Non-Discrimination Policy
©2009 Western New England University All Rights Reserved
This is an Official Page/Publication of Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts