
|
Vol. 13 1991
|
Cite as 13 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. _____ (1991).
CITIZEN SUITS AFTER HALLSTROM: CAN A PLAINTIFF AVOID DISMISSAL AFTER FAILING TO GIVE SIXTY DAYS' NOTICE?
Robert D. Snook 1
CRIMINAL LAW—WHOSE HEAD IS IN THE SAND? PROBLEMS WITH THE USE OF THE OSTRICH INSTRUCTION IN CONSPIRACY CASES
Christine L. Chinni 35
CORPORATE LAW—A SNAPSHOT OF THE TAKEOVER DECADE: POLAROID CORP. v. DISNEY — WHETHER A TARGET CORPORATION HAS THIRD PARTY STANDING TO ASSERT A VIOLATION OF THE ALL-HOLDERS RULE
Joseph Kershenbaum 63
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—FIRST AMENDMENT — A "RATIONAL INTERPRETATION" OF MASSON v. NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.
Maureen E. Walsh 127
Cite as 13 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. _____ (1991).
THE LOCKE REPUBLICAN DEBATE AND THE PARADOX OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN EARLY AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE
David Schultz 155
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—A STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS AFFORDED STATUTORY PRECEDENTS AND DEFERENCE TO FEDERAL AGENCIES
Martha Allard 189
CIVIL PROCEDURE—IN FORMA PAUPERIS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION PLAINTIFFS AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT: ESCAPING THE 15(c) TRAP Sandra L. Cordes-Vaughn 225
IMMIGRATION LAW—DEPORTING ALIENS IN ABSENTIA: BALANCING THE ALIEN'S RIGHT TO BE PRESENT VERSUS THE COURT'S NEED TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS
Timothy W. Murphy 269
Homepage | Directions | Contact | Site Information | Employment Opportunities | Non-Discrimination Policy
©2009 Western New England University All Rights Reserved
This is an Official Page/Publication of Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts