JULIE E. STEINER

Date Type Title Author Work Cited To/Mentioned In/Quoted In Citation (including footnote number)
December 18, 2012 online article Just ask: Will city pay for damage from trees toppled by tornado? Jim Kinney Quoted in The Republican article N/A
2012 treatise citation California Procedure B.E. Witkin and Members of the Witkin Legal Institute Should 'substitute' private Attorneys General enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853 (2011) 12 Witkin, Summary 10th (2012 supp.) Real Prop, § 913, p. 242 (2012)
2012 treatise citation California Procedure B.E. Witkin and Members of the Witkin Legal Institute Should 'substitute' private Attorneys General enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853 (2011) 7 Witkin, Cal. Proc. 5th (2012 supp.) Judgm § 257, p. 77 (2012)
N/A article footnote CLI recommendation 1: Define and develop a law of the ecological commons for present and future generations Carolyn Raffensperger & Burns H. Weston The Illegality of a contingency-fee arrangement when prosecuting public natural resource damage claims and the need for legislative reform, 32 Wm. & Mary Envt'l. L. & Pol’y Rev. 169 (2007)

Footnote 60: http://www.sehn.org/lawpdf/Rec_01%20-%20%28Law_of_Commons%29.pdf
2011 law review footnote Reforming public interest tort law to redress public health epidemics                  Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig                The illegality of contingency-fee arrangements when prosecuting public natural resources damage claims and the need for legislative reform, 32 Wm. & Mary Envt'l L. & Pol'y Rev. 169 (2007) Footnote 98: 14 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 331 (2011)
2011 law review footnote Reforming public interest tort law to redress public health epidemics Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig Should 'substitute' private Attorneys General enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853 (2011) Footnote 109: 14 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 331 (2011)
2011 law review footnote Should "substitute" private Attorneys General enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement Julie E. Steiner Private enforcement of contamination and climate change liability litigation, 9 A.B.A. Energy Litig. J. 4 (Winter 2010) Footnote 13: 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853 (2011)
2011 law review footnote Should "substitute" private Attorneys General enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement Julie E. Steiner The illegality of contingency-fee arrangements when prosecuting public natural resources damage claims and the need for legislative reform, 32 Wm. & Mary Envt'l L. & Pol'y Rev. 169 (2007) Footnotes 18, 25, 43, 49, 51, 62, 110, 111: 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853 (2011)