SUDHA SETTY

Date Type Title Author Work Cited To/Mentioned In/Quoted In Citation (including footnote number)
Winter 2013 law review footnote American criminal procedure in a European context Mar Jimeno-Bulnes What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnote 158: 21 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 409 (2013)
2012/2013 law review footnote Symposium: What are we saying? Violence, vulgarity, lies... and the importance of 21st century free speech: The Supreme Court and political speech in the 21st century: The implications of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Marjorie Heins What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnote 105: 76 Alb. L. Rev. 561 (2013)
2012/2013 law review footnote The opinions by the Attorney General and the Office of Legal Counsel: How and why they are significant Arthur H. Garrison No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 69: 76 Alb. L. Rev. 217 (2013)
2012/2013 law review footnote Pretend to defend: Executive duty and the demise of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Antony Barone Kolenc No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 231: 48 Gonz. L. Rev. 107 (2012)
October 2012 law review footnote Confronting the one-man wolf pack: Adapting law enforcement and prosecution responses to the threat of lone wolf terrorism Beau D. Barnes What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnote 17: 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1613 (2012)
Fall-Winter 2012 law review footnote Discounting the Fourth Amendment: Implications at home with targeted killings abroad J. Brian Meskill No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnotes 177, 180, 191, 193, 200, 203, 207, 209: 12 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 231 (2012)
Fall 2012 law review footnote The Bush Admistration and the Office of Legal Counsel (OCL) torture memos: A content analysis of the response of the academic legal community Arthur H. Garrison No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 131: 11 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 1 (2012)
Fall 2012 law review footnote The building blocks of reform: Strengthening Office of Civil Rights to achieve Title IX's objectives Alison Renfrew Leveling the playing field: Reforming the Office for Civil Rights to achieve better Title IX enforcement, 32 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 331 (1999) Footnotes 40, 108, 126, 127, 140, 143, 149, 153,157, 171, 193-195, 197, 225, 227, 233, 238, 241, 242, 262, 263, 266, 272, 280, 283, 284, 310, 311: 117 Penn St. L. Rev. 563 (2012)
Fall 2012 law review footnote Public diplomacy or propaganda? Targeted messages and tardy corrections to unverified reporting Robert Bejesky The president's question time: Power, information, and the executive credibility gap, 17 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 247 (2008) Footnotes 108, 120, 139: 40 Cap. U. L. Rev. 967 (2012)
August 2012 law review footnote State criminal prosecution of a former president: Accountability through complementarity under American federalism Benjamin G. Davis et al. Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnote 200: 24 Fla. J. Int'l L. 331 (2012)
July 2012 law review footnote The rise of national security secrets Sudha Setty What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnote 85: 44 Conn. L. Rev. 5 (2012)
July 2012 law review footnote The rise of national security secrets Sudha Setty Judicial formalism and the state secrets privilege, 38 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1629 (2012) Footnote 41: 44 Conn. L. Rev. 5 (2012)
July 2012 law review footnote The rise of national security secrets Sudha Setty Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 19, 61, 91: 44 Conn. L. Rev. 5 (2012)
Summer 2012 law review footnote The fog of war reform: Change and structure in the law of armed conflict after September 11 Peter Margulies Comparative perspectives on specialized trials for terrorism, 63 Me. L. Rev. 131 (2010) Footnote 231: 95 Marq. L. Rev. 1417 (2012)
Summer 2012 law review footnote That sinking feeling: Stateless ships, universial jurisdiction, and the Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act

 Allyson Bennett What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnotes 166, 170: 37 Yale J. Int'l L. 433 (2012)
Spring 2012 law review footnote Still unlawful: The Obama military commissions, Supreme Court holdings, and deviant dicta in the D.C. Circuit                  Jordan J. Paust                Comparative perspectives on specialized trials for terrorism, 63 Me. L. Rev. 131 (2010) Footnote 72: 45 Cornell Int'l L.J. 367 (2012)
Spring 2012 law review footnote Is the state secrets privilege in the constitution? The basis of the state secrets privilege in inherent executive powers & why court-implemented safeguards are constitutional and prudent Lindsay Windsor Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnote 45: 43 Geo J. Int'l L. 897 (2012)
February, 2012 law review footnote Congress's constitution Josh Chafetz No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 197: 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 715 (2012)
January 2012 law review footnote Advising terrorism: material support, safe harbors, and freedom of speech Peter Margulies Comparative perspectives on specialized trials for terrorism, 63 Me. L. Rev. 131 (2010) Footnote 201: 63 Hastings L.J. 455 (2012)
Winter 2012 law review footnote Masquerading justiciability: The misapplication of state secrets privilege in Mohamed v. Jeppesen--reflections from a comparative perspective Galit Raguan Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 26, 138, 184: 40 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 423 (2012)
Winter 2012 law review footnote Restoring balance to checks and balances: Checking the executive's power under state secrets doctrine, Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. Jessica Slattery Karich Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnote 199: 114 W. Va. L. Rev. 759 (2012)
2012 law review footnote  National security interest convergence Sudha Setty  Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 50, 74, 96: 4 Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. 185 (2012)
2012 law review footnote  National security interest convergence Sudha Setty No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 9: 4 Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. 185 (2012)
2012 law review footnote Congressional oversight of the "Marketplace of Ideas": Defectors as sources of war rhetoric Robert Bejesky The president's question time: Power, information, and the executive credibility gap, 17 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 247 (2008) Footnote 10: 63 Syracuse L. Rev. 1 (2012)
2012 law review footnote War powers pursuant to false perceptions and asymmetric information in the zone of twilight Robert Bejesky The president's question time: Power, information, and the executive credibility gap, 17 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 247 (2008) Footnotes 232, 344, 354, 564: 44 St. Mary's L.J. 1 (2012)
2012 law review footnote Uneasy neighbors: Comparative American and Canadian counter-terrorism Kent Roach Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnote 188: 38 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1701
2012 law review footnote Judicial formalism and the state secrets privilege Sudha Setty What's in a name: How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011) Footnote 104: 38 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1629 (2012)
2012 law review footnote Judicial formalism and the state secrets privilege Sudha Setty Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnote 6: 38 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1629 (2012)
2012 law review footnote Reforming lawyers into irrelevance?: Reconciling crisis and constraint at the Office of Legal Counsel Peter Margulies No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 22, 27: 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 809 (2012
2012 treatise footnote The new Wigmore: A treatise of evidence: Evidentiary privileges Edward J. Imwinkelreid Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 69.1, 70: Ch. 8 sect. 8.4. : WIGEVPV S 8.4.2 (2012)
2012 treatise footnote The new Wigmore: A treatise of evidence: Evidentiary privileges Edward J. Imwinkelreid Litigating secrets comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 10.1, 13.2: Ch. 8 sect. 8.1: WIGEVPV S 8.1 (2012)
2012 law review footnote Intolerable abuses: Rendition for torture and the state secrets privilege D. A. Jeremy Telman No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorists win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 81: 63 Ala. L. Rev. 429 (2012)
Fall 2011 law review footnote What's in a name? How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11 Sudha Setty Comparative perspectives on specialized trials for terrorism, 63 Me. L. Rev. 131 (2010) Footnotes 3, 112, 127, 130, 190, 230: 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011)
Fall 2011 law review footnote What's in a name? How nations define terrorism ten years after 9/11 Sudha Setty No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorist win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 219: 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011)
Summer 2011 law review footnote China, state secrets, and the case of  Xue Feng: The implication for international trade Sigrid Ursula Jernudd Litigating secrets: comparative perspectives on the state secrets privilege, 75 Brooklyn L. Rev. 201 (2009) Footnotes 185, 187, 189: 12 Chi. J. Int'l L. 309 (2011)
May 2011 law review footnote Constitutional alarmism Trevor W. Morrison No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorist win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 134: 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1688 (2011)
Spring 2011 law review footnote Politico-international law Robert Bejesky The president's question time: Power, information, and the executive credibility gap, 17 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 247 (2008) Footnote 317: 57 Loy. L. Rev. 29 (2011)
Spring 2011 law review footnote Book review: Is there a case for Congress? Elizabeth A. Wilson No more secret laws: How transparency of executive branch legal policy doesn't let the terrorist win, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 579 (2009) Footnote 3: 45 New Eng. L. Rev. 625 (2011)
2011 law review footnote Accountable altruism: The impact of the federal material support statute of humanitarian aid Peter Margulies Comparative perspectives on specialized trials for terrorism, 63 Me. L. Rev. 131 (2010) Footnote 74: 34 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 539 (2011)